{"id":562,"date":"2021-09-28T21:16:54","date_gmt":"2021-09-28T21:16:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/forework.com\/?p=562"},"modified":"2022-12-24T21:17:10","modified_gmt":"2022-12-24T21:17:10","slug":"fair-credit-reporting-act-developments","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/forework.com\/fair-credit-reporting-act-developments\/","title":{"rendered":"Fair Credit Reporting Act Developments"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
In another non-employment case with employment impact, the U.S. Supreme Court reiterated that only a plaintiff who has suffered concrete harm may bring suit for damages under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) \u2013 the federal law governing background checks, including for employment purposes. Nonetheless, this case serves to remind employers of the need to comply with the technical requirements of FCRA.<\/p>\n\n\n
Under FCRA, if employers use a third-party provider to conduct a background check (i.e., consumer report or investigative consumer report), there are certain required notices and communications. Over the years, there have been numerous lawsuits against employers for failure to comply with FCRA\u2019s strict notice and\/or disclosure requirements. In many instances, employees challenged technical violations \u2013 some on behalf of a class \u2013 even though no actual harm was experienced. This led to the Supreme Court\u2019s 2016 decision in Spokeo Inc. v. Robins<\/a>, in which it held that, in order to sue under FCRA, a plaintiff must establish that they have suffered \u201cconcrete\u201d harm \u2013 meaning real injury, and not simply a \u201cbare procedural violation.\u201d The Supreme Court has now reiterated this position in the non-employment case of TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Although it is good news for employers that they will avoid liability if there is no tangible harm (like economic or reputational damages), nonetheless they should still ensure compliance with FCRA\u2019s technical requirements in order to avoid the possibility of such liability \u2013 and also the aggravation and expense of defending against a lawsuit regardless of the merits. These requirements are as follows:<\/p>\n\n\n\n General Notice Requirements. <\/strong>Under FCRA, a \u201cconsumer report\u201d is any communication containing information about an individual\u2019s credit history, character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living. An \u201cinvestigative consumer report\u201d is a consumer report in which information is obtained, at least in part, through personal interviews with neighbors, friends, or associates. These reports include credit checks, criminal background checks, reference checks, educational checks, driving records checks, and social media checks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n When any consumer report or investigative consumer report is being procured for employment purposes, the employer is obliged to provide the following notices and certifications to the applicant\/employee:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Additional Requirements for Investigative Consumer Reports.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Special Rules for Employee Investigations. <\/strong>If an employer uses a third-party consumer reporting agency (such as a human resources consulting firm that regularly does investigations) to conduct an investigation into suspected employee misconduct, or compliance with laws, regulations or the employer\u2019s policies, the employer does not need to provide the notices and disclosures or obtain the authorization described above. However, the employer must provide a summary describing the nature and scope of the investigation to the employee if adverse action is taken based on the investigation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" In another non-employment case with employment impact, the U.S. Supreme Court reiterated that only a plaintiff who has suffered concrete harm may bring suit for damages under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) \u2013 the federal law governing background checks, including for employment purposes. Nonetheless, this case serves to remind employers of the need to …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":563,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","content-type":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-562","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-employment-articles"],"yoast_head":"\n\n
\n